In previous articles, I have mentioned that transport by railroads, and especially electrified rail, is much more efficient, and less damaging to the environment, than transportation by car or truck. In this article I will provide more information on how and why railroads can provide these benefits, what other countries are doing, and how we can get there.
One study shows that in the US, for cargo transport, the existing rail system, which is not one of the most efficient systems in the world, and is generally not electrified, still manages to be four times more efficient than transportation by truck. Another study says that trucks use 11 times more oil in order to transport only a quarter of the cargo. By electrifying two-thirds of US rail, and switching half of truck cargo shipping to rail, total US oil consumption could be reduced by 7 percent. This is a massive reduction in energy use and would dramatically lower carbon emissions.
If the rail infrastructure (electric or not) were expanded further in order to provide a real alternative for cross-country passenger transportation, this could provide even more savings. Like a subway system in a major city, once it reaches a critical size, people are able to depend it on it as a primary transportation method and can give up their cars. In many cases, there are existing unused rail lines that were abandoned decades ago. These may be rebuilt or repaired, and even where the lines are gone, existing right of ways are often still in place. This would facilitate any expansion.
As the network expands, the need for trucks for long distance cargo transportation could be virtually eliminated. We would still need trucks to deliver goods to and from local train depots, but this would require vastly fewer trucks, and electric vehicles would be a good candidate to fill this role. This could help to reduce even further our dependence on gasoline-powered vehicles.
Another advantage of electrified rail is that this is existing, proven technology that has been in use for decades in many places such as Europe. We are not dependent on any experimental or speculative new technology, we already know how to do this. With such a significant reduction in the use of fossil fuels, it also becomes much more feasible to generate the electricity required for the new rail network with renewable power sources.
There are other potential savings as well. Across most of the US and Canada, we are still building new roads and highways. This requires significant resources and energy. The asphalt used is also made from fossil fuels. At the very least we could stop all expansion of road networks. Maintenance of existing roads is also very resource intensive. Trucks, especially, do significant damage to roadways because of the weight they carry. By eliminating more cargo transport by truck, we can greatly reduce the amount of maintenance required, saving even more energy and resources.
Governments frequently talk about the need for more green jobs, and how this can be an area of growth which can help to reduce unemployment. A national project to expand and improve rail infrastructure could create a great deal of jobs, perhaps as many as hundreds of thousands. Many autoworkers have lost their jobs with the collapse of the US auto industry, and most of these workers could likely be easily retrained to build train cars instead of automobiles. Even better, many existing factories could likely be reused for this purpose.
Once the infrastructure is fully established, taxes or other incentives can be put in place in order to provide an impetus for more people and companies to switch to rail. Over time, as the rail system expands and usage grows, we should be able to actually reduce the number and size of roads and highways. This can save money and resources by reducing future maintenance, and some of the land could even be reclaimed for sustainable agricultural use.
By investing in a larger and more efficient rail system, we can create jobs, dramatically reduce our energy use and put in place an infrastructure that can serve us for decades. We already have the technology, and other countries can show us the way and provide assistance. This can be a win for the economy, a win for the environment and a win in the fight against global warming.

8 comments:
It would be awesome if we could implement an efficient rail system. With Warren Buffet now so vested, who knows what will happen. That being said, I don't think he cares if it is green or not... only that it is efficient.
Hi Ben, hopefully in this case, both interests will align. Warren Buffet is a great and savvy investor, but he's also a parent and grandparent.
Remember too, he's often given speeches about the value of index funds for the average investor (similar to John Bogle of Vanguard), and he's mentioned how proud he is to pay taxes (and even wishes he paid more.)
If I remember correctly, both he and William Gates Sr. (Bill Gates' dad) are *supporters* of the inheritance tax. They believe if children can inherit massive amounts of money from their parents, this just creates a new aristocracy, which, in their view, is what the US fought against in the first place.
Hey, who said there weren't some decent billionaires out there. :) I have a healthy respect for Warren Buffet, even though we likely wouldn't agree on some things.
hello
building a new rail infrastructure is not enough, all the US cities have been built around cars, if you want all people to take the train, you have to transform the cities so people can easily get to the train station without cars. that means much higher densities, no more urban sprawl
I don't think highways could ever be reclaimed for agriculture, without talking about all the asphalt, concrete, road base you have to get rid off, the earth underneath is so compacted, and hasn't seen air or water in decades, it wouldn't be very fertile.
it would be more effective to transform it in a new railroad, bike road or solar farm, or factory, or buildings
Niko
Hi Anon, definitely agree with your comment regarding cities.
Europe managed to keep their railways hobbling along - the car lifestyle came much later to Europe than NA. Still, afaik, they're having a hard time keeping it all running & with the advent of those ridiculously cheap flights between European cities, I think railways are feeling the pinch. Too bad - I love rail travel. Are Europeans investing in rail in ways we're not?
Hi Hornblower, as far as I know rail is still doing fairly well in Europe. I know France has a very ambitious plan and I believe now every city with 100,000 people or more has rail service, and they are expanding to all the smaller towns too.
But you're right, the super cheap flights need to go. I admit I haven't flown in a few years, and I had thought all the prices had been rising, but I guess after oil came back from its record, things have changed.
Air travel is heavily subsidized, as is car travel.
Only trains are left to struggle without funds.
The title is ridiculous-The case for rail is that it built the whole fucking world. There is no other rational way to haul shit and people around. Planes and trucks and cars are to fuel intensive with little bang for all the bucks. Trains can pull 1000 times a truck or plane for the same fuel cost. The case for trains was made before any of us existed!
Post a Comment